If they are in, VOTE THEM OUT

‘Bama wants common stock in the banks that took TARP money.

Common stock gets to vote. The Govt. will control over 500 banks.
Whoever controls the banks controls the credit and, therefore, the economy. That’s called socialism.

Send a super strong message no elected “official” can mis-understand:

If they are in, VOTE THEM OUT

cat-law

Hide those bills… if your in, your OUT

Found this in my email. If you are not part of the solution, you ARE part of the problem
Subject:
[petlaw] SB258/HB386 Tennessee Commercial Breeder Bills
As I’m writing this the hearing before the Senate Commerce, Labor &
Agriculture Committee to hear SB258 is supposed to convene in about 1
1/2 hours. We still don’t have a copy of the revised version of the
bill although we have asked for it repeatedly.
Does anyone think this is how government is supposed to work? That a
few select people are supposed to see proposed legislation and the
public can’t see it? That we aren’t allowed a chance to read it or
make comments on it? Are these bills going to be passed because
people opposed to them aren’t given a chance to review them?
I suggest that when you contact people about these bills you let them
know that the people supporting these bills have been doing
everything possible to keep us from seeing the latest versions of the
bills. Spread this information when you tell people about the
bills. Tell them what’s going on. HSUS is known for this.
We all deserve better than this. This legislation affects all of us
and we deserve to see what’s in the bills.

HEY Napolitano "Illegal" is NOT a sick bird

‘Bama minion Napolitano “What we have to do is target the real evil-doers in this business, …”

So, illegal immigrants aren’t illegal, they are just ill eagles???????

Last I looked, the statute reads: “Any alien who enters or attempts to enter the United States at any time or place other than as designated by immigration officers . . . shall, for the first commission of any such offense, be fined under title 18 or imprisoned not more than 6 months, or both.”

Intelligence? Not hardly.

Wishy-washy ‘Bama. Say nothing firm. Do nothing firm. Make no commitments in public. Have all your minions do the dirty work. Blame everything on the Republicans.

Latest side-step? “Leave the prosecution for non-existent, totally political witch hunts to my underling, minion Holder. Then, I don’t have to throw myself under the bus when it backfires.”

“change you can believe in”

Myass it is

Who do you hate???

If you haven’t yet read this insane report, do so by clicking below:
This is a PDF file.
http://api.ning.com/files/UNNlkOVukw8cXztJc4bDEq2ztrm9owekwvHofmLwYgxLlpwX8*h1av8amHehbYkmt3Qvxny16Gh1ob8gFYeRrw2HVq-joU7Y/hsarightwingextremism0904071.pdf

go here to express your disgust.
http://www.grassfire.net/r.asp?U=18285&CID=112&RID=19454178

According to this report put out by DHS secretary, and open-borders
stalwart Janet Napolitano, anyone who opposes big government control
or who opposes “single issues” such as illegal immigration, abortion,
gun control, homosexual marriage, the current financial bailouts,
and literally a host of other issues could be considered a domestic
rightwing extremist!

Author’s note: due to Political Correctness, Extremist is the PC word for Terrorist

Our founding fathers were undoubtedly considered to be terrorists by the British. What do our current government and King George III have in common? They both hate freedom-loving people. Who do you hate?????

Way back when, slaves were refused education because they knew that once a person is educated, he will throw off his shackles. Unless, that is, be he a teacher, Democrat or Liberal socialist, in which case education leads to a super-inflated ego that demands one controls all around them, refusing any permission to join the ranks unless they be steeped in confusion and corruption.

From Newsmax.com

During the March 10 vote, 57 Democrats voted and 54 of them opposed the vouchers program.

Why? Murdock suggested, “Follow the money,” and he pointed out that teachers’ unions shelled out $55,794,000 in political donations between 1999 and 2008, with 96 percent of the funds going to Democrats.

The “winners” in the Senate vote, he added, are “the teachers’ unions, who hate school choice, hate vouchers, and don’t give a damn about school kids when they threaten union pay, benefits, and control of classrooms.”

Big Brother is che’kin’ you out

While not directed immediately and specifically towards those protesting the
heavy hand of government with regards the rights of animal owners, that
group (us) would certainly qualify in the broader sense. Also, as mentioned
below, what was released is only a *summary* of a more-complete, classified
document. Very scary stuff here! ~Sue Ann
FOX News Blogs » FOX Forum » Forum Contributor
April 15th, 2009 1:14 PM Eastern
JUDGE ANDREW NAPOLITANO: Six Things You Should Know About the Homeland
Security Report on ‘Rightwing Extremism’
By Judge Andrew Napolitano
FOX News Senior Judicial Analyst
Homeland Security Warns of Rise in Right-Wing Extremism
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) report entitled “Rightwing
Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in
Radicalization and Recruitment”, dated April 7, 2009, which I have read, is
apparently an unclassified summary of a larger classified report.
1. The summary contains few proper names, has no footnotes of any
significance, lists very few sources, and is drafted with a prejudice
against anyone who criticizes the role of the federal government in our
lives today. It lumps together in its definition of “rightwing extremism”
hate groups, anti-government groups, and single issue groups “such as
opposition to abortion or immigration.”
2. The document itself cautions the reader that the document is “not to be
released to the public, the media, or other personnel who do not have a
valid need-to-know without prior approval” of the DHS. The document refers
to itself as one of a series of intelligence assessments intended to “deter,
prevent, preempt, or respond to terrorist attacks against the United
States.”
3. The thrust of this report is that in the present environment of economic
instability, returning military veterans, those who fear of the loss of
Second Amendment-protected rights, those threatened by an African-American
president, and those who fear “Jewish ‘financial elites’” could all be a
fertile breeding ground for groups whose power and ideas the government
hates and fears. The document is essentially a warning for DHS and FBI
officials to be on the look-out for rootless persons looking for the comfort
of groups as they may be a danger to American security.
4. The summary (unclassified) document is terrifying. One can only imagine
what is contained in the classified version. This document runs directly
counter to numerous U.S. Supreme decisions prohibiting the government from
engaging in any activities that could serve to chill the exercise of
expressive liberties. Liberties are chilled, in constitutional parlance,
when people are afraid to express themselves for fear of government
omnipresence, monitoring, or reprisals. The document also informs the reader
that Big Brother is watching both public and private behavior.
5. The whole purpose of the First Amendment is to guarantee open, broad,
robust debate on the policies and personnel of the government. The First
Amendment presumes that individuals — NOT THE GOVERNMENT — are free to
choose what they believe and espouse, what they read and say, and with whom
they associate in public and in private. The writers of this abominable
report are particularly concerned with the expression of opinions that might
be used to fuel ideas that challenge federal authority or favor state and
local government over the federal government. Unfortunately, legislation
passed during the past eight years gives the DHS and the FBI the tools to
monitor everything from a telephone conversation to the keystrokes used on a
personal computer without a warrant issued by a federal judge.
6. My guess is that the sentiments revealed in the report I read are the
tip of an iceberg that the DHS would prefer to keep submerged until it needs
to reveal it. This iceberg is the heavy-hand of government; a government
with large and awful eyes, in whose heart there is no love for freedom, and
on whose face there is no smile.

Don’t just love the way Obama so positively stands up for our Country and it’s Citizens!

On piracy of one of our ships, and holding hostage of it’s Captain: “piracy is a concern for all nations”

Don’t make me puke….. Send him back to wherever he came from